The right song won. That’s my overriding thought on last night’s Eurovision.
That’s also the most telling reason why I don’t feel wretched, bereft, or annoyed the day after the final.
Usually I feel battered and bruised. Regretful that I’ve poured all of my energies into something which didn’t pay dividends for me, my country, or conclude with the result I’d hoped for. Too many post-Contest experiences have been clouded by embarrassment or disappointment. Not so today. I’m pleased about that.
Portugal’s song taps into the Eurovision I wish it could aspire to more. It helps, obviously, that the music has an air of nostalgia to it. But I don’t hark back to a musical age when things were supposedly better. Rather, there was something about Salvador the artist which seemed rather appealing.
Sobral combines a magnetic self-assurance with a strategy which goes beyond the Eurovision itself. He hasn’t played game of being a Eurovision artist, rather he’s been an artist visiting Eurovision. There’s a distinct difference. In that way he’s closely aligned to Benny and Bjorn from ABBA in Eurovision terms, using Eurovision as a platform for future hard-earned greatness.
Of course, I don’t know that about Sobral yet. That’s an assumption. But the way he positioned himself shortly after taking possession of the Eurovision trophy demonstrated that he had vision and a plan. He consistently resisted playing the Eurovision game on-screen, preferring to be himself than fit the Eurovision artist stereotype, and in doing so secured a life beyond the competition.
By doing that Sobral helped redefine the Contest for what I’d like it to be seen as: a valuable platform for song-writing talent.
The other aspect of the competition I’ve come to really appreciate is how the introduction of the separated contribution of jury and televote to the voting process means that more songs get recognition. Last night’s voting reminded viewers that Bulgaria’s Beautiful Mess was also a winner, so too Moldova’s Hey Mamma! and Belgium’s City Lights.
I remain unconvinced about Sweden’s 5th place. But hey, it’s all over now.
The point is that those Top Five places satisfied a range of different audience demographics likes and dislikes, meaning that in some respects whilst the top slot is the best for a country’s sense of pride, being in the top five could from now on, because of that split voting process, secure a future life for artists and their songs in a way that the previous voting process didn’t.
I’m sorry the UK didn’t get more points. Sorry that more international juries didn’t recognise the song’s emotional content and Lucie Jones’ considerable performing talent.
The fact the tele-vote didn’t garner much is, from my perspective, more to do with the fact that viewers probably only really commit to one or two songs at the most. When you’re presented with something as transformative as Italy’s or Portugal’s you’re bound to (rightly) focus on those.
I recognise how much the BBC and their music consultant have put into efforts for Eurovision this year. I was delighted to hear the cheer for Lucie Jones when she stepped onto the stage during the Jury Final on Friday night, and the anecdotal accounts I was party to in the press centre during the tail end of the week. The BBC worked hard. Nice work Guy Freeman, Helen Riddell, and Ellen Hughes. Your efforts are much appreciated.
What surprised me most this week was the way in which digital, and in particular social, has changed in relation to the Eurovision.
I remember a time (only 6 years ago) when it was relatively straightforward to make an impact on digital platforms. Eurovision has become re-energised in part down to the rise of social media – people are now able to participate in the ultimate social conversation during a live event. The only difference now is that so many more people are doing it.
The EBU has cottoned on to that this year, reinventing their digital proposition at Eurovision.tv to great effect, and developing a digital strategy around exactly the kind of content it knows fans of its greatest piece of IP demand: inclusion in the television process.
This year more than any other year they’ve succeeded in meeting my needs, so much so that I’ve come to realise that the only reason I wanted to go out to Kiev was to get to the Jury Final the night before the big night.
But something else has happened to Eurovision fortunes, demonstrated by the plug EurovisionFanHouse.com got during the live show last night. One product on sale on the site – a T-shirt with ‘est. 1956’ emblazoned across the front – demonstrates how the EBU is repositioning Eurovision.
The Contest no longer needs its champions to defend it. The Contest is now capitalising on its fans devotion and consolidating its position in the hearts of the mainstream audience.
Finding a place to fit in with that redefined strategy is going to be a challenge for every Eurovision commentator like me who have, for the past fifteen years had it good.
Roll on 2018.